Fraud and systematic reviews

A Cochrane review of computer or web-based packages intended to change patient behaviour claimed (wrongly) that such interventions were bad for patients [2]. Within hours of this being trumpeted around the media, it was discovered that the review was incorrect because the authors had entered their data the wrong way round; the true conclusion was exactly the opposite of that originally claimed [3].For full article, go to Anesthesia, 2010, 65; pp. 325-30.



Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s