Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

 

Unique Identifier

 

17302989

 

Authors

 

Shea BJ. Grimshaw JM. Wells GA. Boers M. Andersson N. Hamel C. Porter AC. Tugwell P. Moher D. Bouter LM.

 

Authors Full Name

 

Shea, Beverley J. Grimshaw, Jeremy M. Wells, George A. Boers, Maarten. Andersson, Neil. Hamel, Candyce. Porter, Ashley C. Tugwell, Peter. Moher, David. Bouter, Lex M.

 

Institution

 

EMGO Institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. bshea@ciet.org

 

Title

 

Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

 

Source

 

BMC Medical Research Methodology. 7:10, 2007.

 

Abstract

 

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to develop an instrument to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews, building upon previous tools, empirical evidence and expert consensus. METHODS: A 37-item assessment tool was formed by combining 1) the enhanced Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire (OQAQ), 2) a checklist created by Sacks, and 3) three additional items recently judged to be of methodological importance. This tool was applied to 99 paper-based and 52 electronic systematic reviews. Exploratory factor analysis was used to identify underlying components. The results were considered by methodological experts using a nominal group technique aimed at item reduction and design of an assessment tool with face and content validity. RESULTS: The factor analysis identified 11 components. From each component, one item was selected by the nominal group. The resulting instrument was judged to have face and content validity. CONCLUSION: A measurement tool for the ‘assessment of multiple systematic reviews’ (AMSTAR) was developed. The tool consists of 11 items and has good face and content validity for measuring the methodological quality of systematic reviews. Additional studies are needed with a focus on the reproducibility and construct validity of AMSTAR, before strong recommendations can be made on its use.

 

Publication Type

 

Journal Article.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s